A hybrid job that combines the best of all worlds is in high demand. More than half of employers intend to abandon the conventional five-day workweek in the workplace. With the COVID-19 vaccine available to the general population in the United States since the spring, businesses must act swiftly to ensure a flexible work climate.
If you are a security chief, you have the ability – and the corporate support – to make large-scale changes to your services. A security review will provide you with a big-picture perspective of your company’s readiness for hybrid work. It will expose security flaws and assist you in prioritizing changes to reduce risks. With a structure in hand, you will evaluate three simple measures.
Many of the clients are secured from significant physical and financial damage when they operate in a safe atmosphere. Employees, clients, associates, properties, and investors are all included. If they do not, the consequences of even a single crucial incident will cause organizational harm. This involves impeding a company’s operational effort and placing employees in danger. Companies must first recognize the various security threats they pose to plan for a crucial workplace danger.
Working closely with cross-functional colleagues would enable you to obtain critical perspectives before, and after the evaluation. These individuals would make sure that you have access to the people and technological services required for the evaluation.
You will need to add the following people:
Before you begin the security review, consider holding a kickoff meeting with stakeholders. Get everybody together in the same room (or on a virtual call) to discuss tasks, duties, and deadlines. Have an effort to paint a good image of the priorities you plan to achieve workplace health and safety.
A compliance review necessitates an examination of the security across foundations and workplaces. To do so, you must have a scoring structure. Let’s look at what you’ll need to do to make one.
Start with physical protection and make a list of security risks that come under each structure. Then consider human protection, computer security, and so on. Be certain that each list contains risks unique to hybrid work. For eg, the data protection pillar list might look like this:
Answering the challenge, “What is the worst that could happen under this pillar?” will assist you in identifying the most serious risks. Don’t forget to solicit input from stakeholders so that all points of view are reflected.
A scoring framework is a method that you can use to assess the protection of your hybrid work environment. It would classify occupational security threats based on their probability and seriousness.
You will now complete the security evaluation matrix after identifying risks for each pillar and developing a rating system. An example of how a completed matrix could look can be seen below.
If you’ve completed the matrix, the appraisal results should show:
Your security’s strengths and weaknesses for each hub
Each security pillar’s strengths and weaknesses across all hubs
Assume Hub 1 performs well in terms of infrastructure security. You will use this hub as a blueprint to scale the security programs of this pillar to other hubs. Poor performance in a single pillar can indicate a broader problem. You can, for example, be lacking essential training programs that teach staff how to detect and manage cybersecurity risks.
Since you won’t be ready to handle any danger at once, you can have a course of action in place to improve safety at work and direct the team’s attention. You might consider prioritizing the tasks you need to complete. As an example:
First and foremost, unacceptable risks must be addressed. There are threats you can’t afford to ignore. Failure to fix them could jeopardize business continuity.
Second priority: High and Critical Risks – This danger must be addressed. They may have a serious and long-term effect on your company.
Third priority: Moderate Risks – These risks will have an effect on company practices, but they will not cause long-term harm.
You may also choose to concentrate on a certain hub or pillar. Consider giving feedback if the volume is a top priority.
You may also choose to concentrate on a certain hub or pillar. If the size is a top priority, start by resolving the risks associated with a single center. If the hub has achieved high scores in all pillars, you will scale the security programs to other hubs.
Conducting a security audit is a critical step in protecting your business in the age of hybrid jobs. Using the process outlined above will assist you in identifying and prioritizing important changes.
Entrybook will elevate your organization into a safe and secure environment.